Adrian Midgley wrote:
>When I say PCGs I may well mean an ad hoc grouping of say 60 or so
>GPs and perhaps an arbitrary number of others who simply happen to
>be the total membership of a PCG - rather than a sub-committee of
>a HA going into business, but does it seem to anyone else a sensible
>idea to set up a shell company to handle things better dealt with
>commercially, and to make sure that the directors have suitable
>scope of free action to maintain the interests of the GPs and any
>other shareholders of the PCG.
>
>And has anyone done it yet?
>
>And any examples of particular functions better executed by it?
A few years ago this but didn't the early Fundholders do something similar
ie set up shell companies either to run more efficiently or to cream off NHS
dosh whichever you choose to believe?? And wasn't HMG quick on the banning
button?
Paul Attwood
GP Ramsgate
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|