Why not divide the work as you would otherwise have done, between a nominal
chair an vice-chair. Obviously the braver of the two individuals carried the
can. Remuneration will be agreed by the board according to duties
undertaken.
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask]
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Dr Paul Caldwell
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 1998 11:05 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: PCG co-chairs
We propsed this for my PCG, but was dissallowed by the HA. Although there is
nothing specific in HSC's stopping it, nonetheless there has to be a
responsible officer-the chair- and it is very difficult to see how this can
be split. Plus it makes external communication very difficult and board
meetings impossible.
-----Original Message-----
From: K M Chung <[log in to unmask]>
To: Mailbase <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Friday, November 20, 1998 09:52 PM
Subject: PCG co-chairs
>Now that we are on the topic of PCG chairs. I wonder if many PCGs have
>co-chairs as we have in Bootle and Litherland. This came about because
>none of the GPs could take on the sole role as PCG chair (nobody could
>give up 2-2.5 days a week) and we felt that chair should be a GP. We
>intend to divide the allowance between the 2 GPs. The HA are rather
>stunned by this decision. Is there anything on the guidance that says we
>can't do this? Can the DOH object to this?
>
>Dr K M Chung
>GP
>PCG board member
>Bootle and Litherland PCG
>
>
>
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|