On Fri, 20 Nov 1998 20:33:06 -0000, "Abayomi McEwen"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>making it an optional part of GMS
>>and just paying a higher capitation fee for women of childbearing age
>>to those GPs who chose to provide contraception (i.e. 99.9%).
>This does not address my point. What about the men who receive contraception
>services?? I would favour scrapping altogether or allowing claims for men
>and women and a higher fee for those who keep up to date.
Fair point, so share the money in higher capitation fees for both
sexes, though there should still be higher fees for women as most
contraception is swallowed/inserted by them.
David
---------------------------------------
Dr David Evans
Cardiff
[log in to unmask]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|