JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


GP-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

GP-UK  1998

GP-UK 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

RE: Parity deals

From:

"Paul Caldwell" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 9 Feb 98 15:17:03 UT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (72 lines)

One of my girlfireinds from medical school got a GP post in a leafy, 
straitlaced shire practice. At the endof 6 months assistantship the senior 
partner took her to one side  and said "we are all very pleased with you and 
would like to offer you a partnership, but there is one thing we must clear 
up. You never mention a boyfriend or bring anyone to evening do's. I hate to 
ask this, but are you a lesbian?" "Yes, I am." "oh, dear". "but think of the 
advantages-she's a barrister with a good income, we don't want kids, no chance 
of AIDS. You'll find that I'll never take time off, have financial security 
and there is someone to answer the phone too." "well, yes, I suppose you're 
right and the ladies do like you." She signed a very good partnership 
agreement and at the next Xmas do brought along her real handsome boyfriend. 
She ahd only tested their metal.
Anyone else got similar tales of crusty partnerships?

----------
From: 	[log in to unmask] on behalf of Jel Coward
Sent: 	06 February 1998 23:52
To: 	[log in to unmask]
Subject: 	Re: Parity deals

In article <[log in to unmask]>, J McGuire
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>What do people on the group think about deals to parity.
>--------------------------------

On the whole they are scams.  If you are saleable currently and flexible
in your ideas re area/practice etc then don't stand for it.  

Starting off on a firm *fair* footing is vital - there are all sorts of
knock ons from allowing yourself to be knobbled early.

Deals can vary - sort out something fair -  I don't mean parity at day
one.

I have been a partner in 3 practices with various deals - one was
particularly novel and I think worked well for all concerned.  Money was
not an issue in any of my changes.

50pc is not even a sick joke - don't go there - if they cannot be
reasonable about this then what are the chances re all the other aspects
of practice that require compromise.

Incidentally, I would be quite keen to have a new partner who knows how
to negotiate a fair compromise - rather than one who accepts being sh*t
on.

There are many issues - parity deal, buildings, other assets - it all
needs careful scrutiny a lot of clear dialogue and sorting out in
advance.  You need to know the score at day one - what may seem a harsh
deal on paper may not actually be so bad.

Nothing saddened me more than hearing the tales of woe that some of my
registrar contempories met.  I could not beleive how so many GPs seemed
to be able to treat young colleagues as gravy trains.  This did not
happen to me - I have always had good parners (except for one git in N.
Yorkshire - I hope you lurk!) - but I was still careful.

Caveat emptor!  Talk *lots*

Cheers.
-- 
Jelly Bean              [log in to unmask]

When you get fed up surfing....
....go find some waves.





%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
June 2022
October 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager