[log in to unmask],Net wrote at 17:14 on 03/11/98
about "Re: MMR revisited":
-----------------------------
>I would just comment that this
>appears to be yet another case of absence of proof being presented as
>proof of absence. I would have thought the bottom line is that until we
>know the true cause behind the problems that have tentatively been
>linked with MMR by some, MMR will remain a candidate whatever the
>'official line' says. It's all down to probability. No sensible
>scientist will talk of zero probability on the basis of absence of
>proof.
Travelling on buses causes cancer. No proof of this, yet.
So - we won't meet you on a bus then?
--- OffRoad 1.9r registered to Adrian Midgley
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|