On Wed, 4 Nov 1998 03:33:59 +0000, Chris Salter wrote:
>You can probably [having read up on any
>previous relevant research] safely say that currently there is no
>scientifically acceptable proof that a link exists. I doubt that you can
>safely say that there is 100 per cent certain proof that a link does not
>exist. That is a very important differentiation.
It is.
We do need, on the face of the 'evidence' to have more research in this
area.
I am not convinced that the study that showed no link is enough on its
own.
Risk
-------------------------------------------
Ahmad Risk MB BCh
The Good Doctor Ltd
http://mednetics.org
Tel: +44 1273 724866
Fax:+44 1273 748198
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|