> From: Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>
> I have no specific knowledge of MMR. I would just comment that this
> appears to be yet another case of absence of proof being presented as
> proof of absence. I would have thought the bottom line is that until we
> know the true cause behind the problems that have tentatively been
> linked with MMR by some, MMR will remain a candidate whatever the
> 'official line' says. It's all down to probability. No sensible
> scientist will talk of zero probability on the basis of absence of
> proof.
>
Fascinating. So the meteor shower in a fortnight will be the cause
of insanity in .0001 of the population who present with psychosis on
that day. As does each full moon. And eclipses.
Just because some' prat of a scientist' and a 'cappy journal' prints
a crappy paper we have all this may-hem:-(
Dr David J Plews
------------------------
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|