[log in to unmask],Net wrote at 15:06 on 03/11/98
about "Re: Windows 2000":
-----------------------------
>To: [log in to unmask]
>From: [log in to unmask] (Ian McNicoll)
>Subject: Re: Windows 2000
>Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 15:06 +0000 (GMT)
>
>Yes the hardware has been 32bit for a long time but in practical terms
32 bit
>Operating systems e.g. Win95 and NT are much more demanding of
processor speed
>
>and RAM than 16 bit systems. It is only in the last 2 years that RAM
and
>processor prices have dropped dramatically. Caning to a 32 bit OS 2
years ago
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^funny you should put it that
way. 32 bit OS/2 years ago was running quite nicely on my 486SX25
with 12 MBytes RAM...
>would have meant a substantial change in hardware for many practices.
-----------------------------
--- OffRoad 1.9r registered to Adrian Midgley
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|