In message <000101bdf9ad$d3f5c640$f23aac3e@laptop>, Trefor Roscoe
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>My local tb know the set up that I have, they have not objected. the penalties
>are repairing the damage
is this legally enforcable, and damage to what?
The NHSnet seems a bit shaky anyway! ;->>
> and disconnection.
that could happen. Would you mind?
Disconnecting a significant number of GPs would seem, on the face of it,
to be unhelpful in implementing the WP and Information Strategy.
>Concentrates the mind somewhat
Does it? If the question of "repairing the damage" remains so
nebulous... ?
Mary
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Andrew Herd
>> Sent: 15 October 1998 18:16
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: RE: GP-UK on the NHSnet?
>>
>>
>> I totally agree with your shout - but you try it on your local NHS telecomms
>> people and they will have a fit if you even have the potential to access the
>> Internet from the same machine - whether you do it at the same time or not.
>>
>> The whole thing is rather academic, given that no-one has ever specified
>> what the penalties are for breaking the Code of Connection (maybe they
>> have - disconnection? excommunication? fatwa declared by the IMG?).
Mary Hawking Kingsbury Court Surgery Church Street Dunstable LU5 4RS
tel:01582 663218 (surgery)fax:01582 476488 (surgery)
Member of British Healthcare Internet Association
Dunstable and Houghton Regis Locality Commisssioning Pilot
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|