On Thu, 15 Oct 1998 23:04:26 +0100
"PETER FELLOWS" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
> At G PC meeting today a paper from the Department of Health was produced
> outlining the payment on offer for Primary Care Group board members
I would just like to thank Peter on my own behalf, but I am sure I
reflect the views of other list members, for a very full and helpful
posting. It would be nice if other GPC members would be as open.
>
> I was told that whilst I cannot refer to detailed paragraphs in the document
> as yet, I am free to comment on the debate at G PC. Hence I will simply
> reproduce verbatim what I said in the debate.
Is there any way of finding out what other members said in debates? Are
there any transcripts of meetings? If not, why not? I can understand if
for reasons of negotiating, security must be maintained, but how about
at least a yearly 'statute of limitations' so that we can find out who
took which view, even if belatedly.
> No superannuation is simply unacceptable.
Hear hear.
>. There was only one who thought the deal was reasonable, except for superannuation.
I would particularly like to know, even next year, who this was.
> I know what I would tell the DoH to do with it's offer if I had put my name
> forward for a PCG. I wonder what the rest of you will now do?
I've already told them!
> Let me know. Also let me know if you approve or disapprove of my stance.
Agree absolutely. No pay, no way. End of argument.
Cheerio,
Graham
'Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at
which one can die.'
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|