JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


GP-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

GP-UK  1998

GP-UK 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

recidivism (was: GP Morale)

From:

[log in to unmask] (Iain L M Hotchkies)

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sun, 11 Oct 1998 00:18:47 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (97 lines)

Mark Trowell typed:

> the biggest problem I find is reducing dependency in a hard core of
> patients. Trying to wean patients off the routine of monthly/3
> monthly/six monthly repeat consultations.

me 2

I'm sure my personal experience is shared by many on the list, in that,
I would estimate, 80% of my workload is generated by 5% of the list.

And most of these 5% aren't very poorly and in desperate need of medical
attention. Mostly, the situation has arisen that they see me reguarly,
for a variety of reasons.

Some of them, I don't mind seeing, and, obviously, I am to blame (at
least partly) for the way that the situation *has* arisen.

My life would be lot easier if these 5% just "disappeared", but that
isn't going to happen. I won't be following in the footsteps of my
erstwhile "colleague" from Hyde (the GP who has *ALLEGEDLY* murdered a
few patients for monetary gain).

As has been well publicised on this list, *my* solution to the morale
problem was to reduce my NHS committment, and keep reducing that
committment, until the stress levels began to drop. I now to half a
session every other Tuesday.

No, I do the equivalent of 6-7 clinical sessions a week, which keep a
certain of money in the coffers, though not enough bearing in mind the
huge drain that my heroin addiction causes... er, no, I meant the huge
drain my children, nursery fees, private school fees, petrol-guzzling
monster car repayments, etc, etc, (I hardly need repeat them here as you
will all no doubt be intimately familiar with them), Extra monies must
be obtained from other sources - journalism, medico-legal work,
independent tribunal service are the main ones. This tops of my income
to just over the average intended net remunertaion (only just) but the
stress levels involved in earning this are a lot lower than they were
when I was doing 9+ clinical sessions a week and (in the early days) 3-4
nights a week on call.

The point has been made that there will be financial consequences of the
increaesing number of women in GP. This is "a good thing" for many
reasons, but it does mean that a higher proportion of GPs will be
non-main-breadwinners in the househould and they may therefore care less
about the gradually eroding financial value - in the gummint's eyes - of
GPs in general.

Male traditional senior partner types (uesed to live and die) for the
practice. Everything was coordinated by them to make the practice as
efficient (in all senses) as possible. No, so many GPs have other
professional fee-earning interests.

I read on this list of GPs doing things I would never do. A Recent
example, spending hours checking through accounts for IOS fees. We see
what we caculated and see what the HA says, if there's broad
aggreement, leave it. Haggling over a couple of hundred pounds will soon
be a waste of my time. It might not be a waste of the practice manager's
time but, with respect, I don't think he has the required skills.

I'm sure there's a cliche about "someone getting the whatever they
deserve". Never been truer than it has been in GP. I worked with someone
once who was abrupt, never listened, wouldn't prescribe antibitocs,
would order addicts out of his room without thinking. Most of the
patients disliked him. Or I should day that most of the patients who
liked me, didn't liek him. Which should tell you just as much about me
as it did about him. What were the differences between us? Patient
satisfaction surveys would show a swing to me, but what about scientific
measurments. Did I cure more people than him? Did I reduce morbididity
than him? I doubt it. On the contrary, very possibly. The point being
that the patients liked me and I (must have) liked them. But he was the
one who buggered off to the golf course at 11.30am while I was in
surgery an hour later, taking calls from patients who couldn't get into
see me in the morning, and doing all the rest of the stuff my mode of
working generated but which my partner's mode of working did not.

Who's going to be the first to have an MI? Who's going to be the first
to take antidepressants?

So, I cut down my sessions. I can't change the way I work, because I
believe it's linked inextricably with my personality, and I believe even
more firmly that I cannot change that.

This seemed the most logical step and, so far, it seems to be working.
Many of the signs of stress have disappeared, or are improving. Sleeping
better. More tolerant of children's behaviousr at home (though not a lot
- but this may be more to do with the kids thab I. Better relationship
with wife. IBS which appeared for the first time about 12-18 months ago
(when things were at their worst) has largely settled.

[fx: sings] "Things are getting better!"




%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
June 2022
October 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager