[log in to unmask],Net wrote at 18:34 on 07/10/98
about "Re: Gutenberg (Was: Who's received the Executive Summary)":
-----------------------------
> After 521 years in beta, it is time to abandon the paper
> distribution systems,
>>
>>But, what percentage of GP's have access to the relevant systems to
obtain
>>this information?
>>Jenny
-----------------------------
So far, Jenny, Mary has demonstrated that 75% of GPs do not have
access to the relevant systems to access the paper...
The proportion of practices with one member - secretary, GP,
manager, having access to the Web is above 25% now.
So experimentally the proportion for whom the modern methods can
work is now above the proportion for whom the old methods did work.
In principle at least any of us can go into an internet cafe and
access whatever is on there, however I would agree that we need
access via work or home.
The problem of knowing what is published is not too hard to solve,
it requires a task creating either for a human or software, of
checking a relatively small number of pages of the web for
alterations, each week.
For more rapidly moving info, if that is not an oxymoron when
applied to the administrative layers of the NHS which like an onion
can make one cry, a daily check might be needed.
But what if practice X doesn't check, cries an admindroid...practice
X being the people who turn the fax off at night, stack the SFA
amendments unopened with the Read and drug dictionary upgrade discs,
and _never_ read the HSEs on paper the NHSE sends them...
Well, what of it. They are less bothered by what they regard as
crap and may actually look for some info once not bombarded by
Sturgeons other nine tenths.
--- OffRoad 1.9r registered to Adrian Midgley
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|