In message <[log in to unmask]>, Declan Fox
<[log in to unmask]> writes
><<THere is a serious point to this which is that if we want to have
>things that matter measured rather than things that don't matter but
>are easy to measure and administrators feel they can understand then
>there is nobody else qualified to actually sort out what the things
>are, and how to record them or assess them or genrally deal with them.>>
>
>Which takes the "things that matter, not the things you can measure"
>argument a few stages further. Does anyone think that society is moving
>rather quickly in that same direction?
I'm not sure - could we have examples?
I *am* sure the NHS - even the new, dependable NHS - isn't!
Mary
>
>Declan
Mary Hawking Kingsbury Court Surgery Church Street Dunstable LU5 4RS
tel:01582 663218 (surgery)fax:01582 476488 (surgery)
Member of British Healthcare Internet Association
Dunstable and Houghton Regis Locality Commisssioning Pilot
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|