But it won't matter will it because we won't be fundholding after
1.4.99!!! So who cares?
GillianIn article <[log in to unmask]>,
[log in to unmask] writes
>> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 16:58:16 EST
>> Subject: Re: Untitled
>> From: [log in to unmask]
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Reply-to: [log in to unmask]
>
>> In a message dated 29/01/98 20:32:03 GMT, you write:
>>
>> << Now when real dates in 99 come along, they get all confused! >>
>>
>> specifically 09/09/99. This will cause as many headaches as the end of 1999
>> accordicng to some analysts.
>>
>> Trefor
>>
>The first panic date is probably 1/10/98 for GPFH's. If you set an
>expected treartment date of 18 months then you are into Y2K...will
>your fundholder software cope???
>
>Dr David J Plews
>---------------------
--
Dr Gillian Braunold
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|