JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


GP-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

GP-UK  1998

GP-UK 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Ahmad, PCGs & where to next?

From:

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 23:56:37 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (60 lines)


>NOT FUNNY and quite inapropriate. The man has integrity, the peddlars of
viagra do not.
>
>Trefor


Instead of flaming each other can't we save our energies for those who
threaten to make such an appalling mess of the health service?  My own
small decision and action was to submit my resignation to our PCG steering
group just a few hours before reading Ahmad's letter.  

The drip drip of information from the centre has been a cynical attempt to
hide a rather incompetent revolution in the provision of primary health
care.  Weren't we promised evolution?

Ahmad is right about forced co-existence.  While PCGs formed by volunteers
could do something useful our profession will not be serving patients
interests (or our own) by acquiescing to the present proposals.

There is now widespread evidence that merger mania is frequently not in the
best interests of companies. Why should we be any different?  If they do
survive it's often by sacking a large part of the workforce - if they don't
the organisation fails, but if this happens in primary care who's left to
look after the patient. 

IMNSVHO Guidelines have value but if a task in primary care can be done
according to an auditable protocol it doesn't need a doctor to do it.
Clinical governance as currently envisaged is about the destruction of
General Practice.

Fixed budgets for everything in a health service that centrally still
claims a virtually open ended coverage is a hypocracy that should shame any
government.  If there isn't enough money for comprehensive health care the
government should decide what it can afford to pay for, should reward staff
fairly, and ensure adequate staff to carry out the selected tasks.

Finally there is absolutely no evidence that I see that the present
proposals will release money from bureaucracy into patient care.  Large
organisations breed bureaucracy.  Clinical governance is a huge
bureaucratic task in itself with totally unproven benefits in terms of
patient care.

Fund-holding was bad, but the present proposals are worse.  We have a
lesson learnt from the history of the last government.  The rates were a
bad tax, but the poll tax was worse.

There is (just) time for the government to wake up, find a solution which
saves face, and moves us forward.  Conflict always leaves casualties so
patience and tolerance are great virtues but they don't justify appeasement.

If we can stick together (PCG enthusiasts please, please take note) we may
just save a battle that could only harm everyone.

What else can we do?
JB


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
June 2022
October 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager