> I *know* what *strangeness* is - after all wasn't one of those strange
> particles named after me - Kaon, or K ?
nope - wrong sort of "strange"
strange attractors are a bit of chaos theory - about to be renamed K-os
theory no doubt.
C(14)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask]
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Katie Law
> Sent: 16 September 1998 12:52
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Strange particles
>
>
> Ahmad Risk <[log in to unmask]> writes
>
> >No. Strange Attractors have nothing to do with mechanics. I'll
> >explain later.
>
> Hmmmph! (indignant hmmmph)
>
> I *know* what *strangeness* is - after all wasn't one of those strange
> particles named after me - Kaon, or K ?
>
> But I am intrigued as to how you will explain!
>
> Strangeness is conserved by strong interactions ;-)
> Mix it all with some quarks and there may be a grand unification ;-)
>
> >As for gravity, this is something we know very little about.
>
> I'll explain later.
> --
> K+
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|