On Mon, 7 Sep 1998 23:30:39 +0100
"PETER FELLOWS" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Your HA is wrong. It is of course perfectly possible to give contraceptive
> advice to a patient during her pregnancy, and so you are entitled to
> initiate, let alone continue, a claim even if the patient is pregnant at the
> time. ( Giving advice qualifies you for payment).
But surely the patient has to *apply for contraceptive services*..how
can she when she is preggers? And if some smartalecs think it's a jolly
good wheeze to scrape some extra FP1001/gms4's etc. all it means is
that *all* of us will have to do it in order not to fall behind in the
pay stakes, ending up with the usual scenario of all doing more work
for *no* extra money, because of the pool system. Why can't people *see*
this?
Mutter, mutter...
Graham
'Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at
which one can die.'
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|