On Wed, 2 Sep 1998 23:10:51 +0100
"Dr Paul Attwood" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I take it that average intended remuneration would be on average list and be
> pro rata? I would be very tempted to off load some 300 of my heavy users if
> not!
Really? If the truth be known, in your heart of hearts, would you not
chuck off those 300, lose the capitation etc gladly, because you would
have at least 30 per cent more time in your day?!
I used to play a wonderful game drawing up the list. Its amazing just
how much work is involved in only the top thirty names, let alone 300!
Cheerio,
Graham
'Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at
which one can die.'
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|