[log in to unmask],Net writes:
>From: "PETER FELLOWS" <[log in to unmask]>
<snipped to bits>
>[log in to unmask]> writes
>>>>What would be the advantages and disadvantages? I would welcome a
>salaried service.
>I think a lot of doctors
>would now prefer salaried posts as "consultants in primary care
>medicine",
>with similar contracts to hospital consultants,
....
The key to a decent salaried service is in effective national
negotiation,
>not the piecemeal moves to salaried options which we are now witnessing.
> I predict that within 15 years all GPs will either be salaried or
>working
>outside NHS contracts.
> Peter
>Fellows.
Peter, would you come down to Exeter to a BMA Div meeting involving two
solicitors from a firm with 54 partners and a total of 200ish staff,
and an accountant from a like-sized firm, discussing how they went from
single --> 6 parnterships into the big fimrs, how they run them and
make them woirk, pay themselvs, keep people in line etc?
If not, who from GPC or other central gurus do you think would be good
on it?
Date to be set finally still, but I think 21 Oct is likely.
The subagenda is of course that I see both pressures toward and
benefits from Exeter GPs uniting in a single supergroup of 60, with
initially 21 outlets including the dedicated OoH centre, and directing
our managers that they are to run the org to achieve a specified set of
rewards and conditions for a standard GP...
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|