JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


GP-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

GP-UK  1998

GP-UK 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Removing patient records from practice computers

From:

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sat, 8 Aug 1998 20:36:31 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (60 lines)

In message <[log in to unmask]>, David Evans
<[log in to unmask]> writes

>I've wondered in the past whether keeping the computer records of old
>pts might breach the data protection act, but I've been told the law
>allows you to keep computer records for as long as they might
>reasonably be needed. This includes keeping them for as long as the pt
>might sue for negligence, which is up to 21 years (I think) for
>maternity cases.

A number of roblems here:-
1. The law allows patients to sue for 3 years (I think) after they have
*discovered* the problem - or three years after the age of maturity
(i.e. 21) in the case of a child. Wasn't there a case recently where it
was decided that in the case of an individual who was mentally
incompetent , there was no time limit?
2. In the case of birth injuries, this information would be , not in the
child's but in the mother's EPR. Should we keep all *women's* records
(on this basis) for the length of time the *child* might sue?
3.Authentication.
Suppose you're a paperless practice. The *only* way of proving that your
record has remained unaltered is the audit trail.
Suppose your patient moves to the opposite end of the country.. and
later has a complaint.
You have either printed out the record - or sent it electronically -
*and in neither case does the audit trail go with it*!
Delete your record, and you *cannot* prove that you made that entry at
that time .. even worse, if the next practice isn't paperless (or only
keys in the major points) and then shreds your printout, there'd be no
record of the consultation ever having occurred!
Think twice.. then thrice.. then..
Mary
PS
</cloak and dagger mode>
suppose I'm a GP in trouble .. I'm paperless and I *need* to lose a few
details "we have done those things we ought not to have done, and we
have left undone those things we ought to have done, and there is no
goodness in us  .. " .. what can I do?
A rather expensive suggestion.
I *change systems*.. and *lose the audit trail*
I make a buisnes case.. not hard to do with anything if you really want
to do it!
The night before the data is transfered, I stay late at the surgery..
and - er- *edit* the relevant records.
Next morning, the data transfer is made.. and *the audit trail lost* ..
incredible how many accidents can happen to backup tapes (said with
feeling.. and we *wanted* to keep the ones we found couldn't be
restored!)
</cloak and dagger mode>
The problem will get worse if and when we're all paperless... unless we
have a transferable audit trail.. and my imagination boggles..

Mary Hawking Kingsbury Court Surgery Church Street Dunstable LU5 4RS
tel:01582 663218 (surgery)fax:01582 476488 (surgery)
Member of British Healthcare Internet Association
Dunstable and Houghton Regis Locality Commisssioning Pilot


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
June 2022
October 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager