Message text written by INTERNET:[log in to unmask]
>AFAIK it is not a requirement that GPs keep computerised notes, and those
that take the time and trouble (and expense) to do so should be paid for
their work. The "independant" review body says that my workload has not
changed. It has, this is new work that GPs have not previously been doing,
and I will be holding out for a proper fee. :-)
<
Sorry to butt in but why? Was it not a voluntary choice? Do not some
HAs contribute towards, or pay in full, hardware/software - and staff time?
If the IT enthusiasts are paid for their hobby out of the same finite
pool from which I am paid then I will be just a teeny-weeny bit upset.
But thanks for proving my point about the "time, trouble and expense" of
keeping computer records, presumably in comparison with paper records.
David Roberts
Reactionary
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|