----------
> From: [log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Cervical screening
> Date: 29 July 1998 20:05
>
> In a message dated 7/29/98 10:10:13 GMT, Michael Durham writes:
>
> <<
> I would be fascinated to hear from anybody who can tell me why these
> screening catastrophes always seem to occur in cervical cancer
> screening.......and if there are any other areas of health which might
be
> similarly prone to clinical errors/differences.
> >>
> On this occasion, wasn't this about treatment rather than an error with
> screening procedures and interpretations thereof?
> Jenny
> Dr Jennifer Kay
> GP London
Technically, yes. But there is supposed to have been an error over
biopsies - isn't that a kind of screening too?
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|