[log in to unmask],Net writes:
>Have just heard that the largest practice in our small OOH Coop is
>resigning
>thus making it non-viable. The thought of going back to doing our own
>on call
>traditionnel style is horrific. Rumour has it that this practice is
>starting
>up a profit-making deputising service with an ex-deputising manager.
>Hey
>presto they will invite us to join it at considerably more expense than
>the
>COOP. No doubt this practice will also apply for OOH start-up funds too.
>How can 'friends' do this? What a way to treat collegues.
Did they make any mention of things they didn't like beforehand? And
if so, did anyone listen?
What does your LMC think? OoH funds can only be allocated with
agreement of LMC and HA.
Are they in the same PCG?
OoH arrangments will fairly soon coalesce onto PCG boundaries, and
attempts to keep other groupings between those and a HA wide service
with no internal free edges in being will fail.
What has the public perception of the Co-op been? Does the CHC see the
fragmentation as likely to improve service or safety?
How will the existing kit of the co-op be divided? Does everyone have
a set of rules in the co-op constitution or the articles of the
companies which make it up which covers the dissolution?
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|