>In message <00b201bdb4c6$4888efa0$0100007f@localhost>, Paul Galloway
><[log in to unmask]> writes
>>> Back to basic principles. First, what are the IT needs of PCG's?
>Doesn't this depend, in part, on the functions (or "Business Plan") of
>the PCG?
>Some of the needs - eg communications, dissemination of directives and
>information, budgeting etc will be independant of level - others will
>depend entirely on what the PCG is planning to do - and *all* of them
>will depend on the requirements of the New, IM&T Strategy.. to be
>launched when the next lot of daffodils arrive ;->>?
>Mary
I think that networking the PCG as a single organisation is a
"no-brainer", IE we should get on with it ASAP, in order to realise
savings in time and effort as soon as possible.
Anyone who tries to organise things in which GPs should be involved
will agree that it is difficult to get physical presence, or even get
through on the telephone.
What other functions we float on the network does depend on
developments, but I hope everyone agrees that an extranet for each PG
is a clear no-lose priority.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|