[log in to unmask],Net writes:
>In BHIA, I had attempted to gather together all the disparate agendas,
> personal interetsts and philosophies to achieve a common dialogue.
>This attempt has failed pricesly because the vested interests were too
>powerful to be put aside.
Lighten up Ahmad.
You are getting absolutist again. BHIA is a success, like everything
in life it is not perfect or complete.
There is a clear if broad and occasionally tatty thread of consensus
running through BHIA and spreading to the rest of the HA, on the prime
directive, that the technology of the Internet shall be made available
and used in preference to proprietary empire building technologies.
Remember, it is a five year mission, and nobody has been there before.
Carry on going boldly, and remember, Kirk and Pickard draw salaries.
The rest of it, the ingrained institutional stupidities and lack of
ability in the middle reaches of NHS management which has left small
practices such as yours and mine seriously disadvantaged by the
mechanisms of funding, is an enormous scandal, but one which actually
is being addressed by two parts of the strands of PCG introduction -
the move away from an alleged independent contraction and the
commitment to quality.
The cavalry are here (no surporse there is a lot of horseshit flying
around).
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|