-----Original Message-----
From: Ahmad Risk <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 07 July 1998 10:05
Subject: RE: Nurse representation on PCG boards
>On Mon, 6 Jul 1998 20:21:27 -0700, Ruth Livingstone wrote:
>
>>Well, we = 7 lead GPs democratically elected by our partners,
>>and the combined opinion of 40+ nurses who attended a
>>nursing PCG meeting. I think that is a better demonstration of
>>democracy then we currently experience in the mother of all
>>parliaments ;-)
>
>No, I am actually interested in the process itself, the nitty gritty.
>
>How were the 7 lead GPs elected?
>
>What do you exactly mean by "the combined opinion of 40+ nurses who
>attended"?
>
>What about the ones who did not attend?
>
>How do you propose to elect other constituents, for example, public
>and HA reps?
>
>What is the actual management and decision making processes if and when
>you 'elect' all those reps?
>
>What is the ongoing democratic checks and balances you propose to put
>in place?
>
>How are you going to measure it?
>
>How do you propose to democratically canvass the views of those who are
>not active, the electorate, if you like?
>
>How are you going to get rid of dysfunctional board members?
>
>How are you going to ensure the quality of board members?
>
>I do believe that these are crucial questions that need answers now. I
>have other questions, but that'll do for now ;-)
>
>Ahmad
>
>________________________________________
>
>Dr Ahmad Risk
>http://mednetics.org
>home: +44 1273 748198
>work: +44 1737 240022
>fax: +44 1737 244660
>
>
>speaking as a pn who has a working group of pro active nurses in Barnet we
at the next AGM will elect 3 nurses who may be invited to be a part of the
PHG. Do not know how any of the other community nurses will elect their
member
zena np
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|