In message <[log in to unmask]>, Trefor
Roscoe <[log in to unmask]> writes
>This means that the best way to do the 'other practice sites' link is to
>have one person doing it and everyone else linking. That way the info is
>complete. Please could we have a vote for the idiot/hero who will take this
>on. Then we can all have one link to the main site. Several mirrors of the
>info are possible, but one central point would be better.
>
>Eventually one presumes that the NHSnet will have this info.
Is this something we should be asking for on the NHS Net?
Mary
>
>How about some drug company sponsorship for the cost of maintaining it?
>
>Trefor
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [log in to unmask]
>>[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Ahmad Risk
>>Sent: 04 July 1998 18:01
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: Re: New practice websites
>>
>>
>>On Sat, 4 Jul 1998 16:29:45 +0100, Adrian Midgley wrote:
>>
>>>This may be the only good use of frames in web pages that I have seen
>>>for a long time, IE each of you set up frames pointing to the various
>>>county/lmc sites, and thus their pages appear in context on your sites.
>>
>>I disagree.
>>
>>Framimg someone else's content is confusing and may lead to wrong
>>impression that it is your content ;-)
>>
>>If you wish to provide a gateway to other sites, just have a simple
>>'Links' page.
>>
>>Ahmad
>>
>>________________________________________
>>
>>Dr Ahmad Risk
>>http://mednetics.org
>>home: +44 1273 748198
>>work: +44 1737 240022
>>fax: +44 1737 244660
>>
>>
>>
>
Mary Hawking Kingsbury Court Surgery Church Street Dunstable LU5 4RS
tel:01582 663218 (surgery)fax:01582 476488 (surgery)
Member of British Healthcare Internet Association
Dunstable and Houghton Regis Locality Commisssioning Pilot
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|