On Thu, 2 Jul 1998 14:15:34 +0100
"PETER FELLOWS" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 01 July 1998 18:24
> Subject: Re[2]: Any good questions for MRCGP
>
>
>
> >Why do members and *Fellows* think that a bit of academic discipline
> >enables them to preach to their colleagues, or worse, to advise govt. on
> >terms and conditions?
>
>
> Snide comment! Can't resist rising to the bait!!!!
>
Sorry Peter, you misunderstand. Ihave every respect for your medico-political
views,grovel grovel. I was not trying to be snide, was genuinely
referring to the peer-appointed *Fellows* as in FRCGP.Must admit that
reading it your way does bring a smile to my face and I understand the
confusion. (Something I don't get with my name:-)..Only an *unhappy* *coward*
would *risk* a brush with the *law*, rather run with the *herd* and feel
the ground *trimble*.
Anyway, grovel grovel again,
Cheerio,
Graham
'Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at
which one can die.'
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|