See my reply to the another message, but boy does this one look to be a
mess. Why didn't the HA try to stop it happening? I think I would be asking
some hard questions of the purchasing team/chief exec at the HA.
A
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask]
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
> Sent: 24 June 1998 12:06
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: NHS TRUST.....AN OXYMORON
>
>
> I agree that when fundholders were in their heyday they could hurt Trusts
> financially but the problem is locally that fundholders are being more and
> more tied by the Health Authority to the local maverick alleged
> Trust. ie its
> more difficult to financially hurt them.
> I suspect the PCGs are going to go the same way but the main
> problem is the
> massive disinvestment the alleged Trust are making to balance the
> books will
> make us inherit a wasteland community care wise. Its like the Pythonesque
> vignette of the guying telling him he's going to inherit a peat
> bog. This is
> the best case if we don't inherit a debt. They are allegedly skimping on
> pennies on strucctures.
> ideas
> Shahid
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|