In article <[log in to unmask]>, Ewan Davis
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>The impact on NHSNet of it not supporting Internet standards alongside X.400 is
>that we continue to deny the NHS community good quality, low cost (often free)
>software which uses Internet mail standards not X.400. The latest example of
>this are the excellent 'Net Folders' extensions to MS Outlook which require
>POP3.
This presumably explains when I mail my Health auth. collegues and
attach files, they often get rubbish - and complain that its my fault.
>
>The suggestion has been made than SMTP and POP3 be added to the NHSNet Message
>Handling Service alongside X.400. This is known to be technically trivial and I
>hope the suggestion will be taken up. Such an approach would allow users to
>chose when to use X.400 and when SMTP/POP3.
Can anyone explain what and how to send attachments which will pass okay
through the X400 gateways??
,.....presumably html mail (which IS useful for some limited messages)
is out of the question??
Help/ advice please
--
Huw Thomas
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|