JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


GP-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

GP-UK  1998

GP-UK 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Patient Care Grinders (PCGs)

From:

"Ahmad Risk" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Ahmad Risk

Date:

Thu, 04 Jun 1998 20:30:15 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (140 lines)

On Wed, 3 Jun 1998 15:33:22 GMT, Graham Ride wrote:

>As a potential patient, devil's advocate and Jo Public I need to know, in a
>nutshell, what the governments PCG proposal is so that I can assess why you
>say all these things will obtain.

PCGs are Bad for Patients,  Bad for Doctors and Bad for Britain.

Here is the first batch of 5 reasons why this is so:

>>1.  Postcode discrimination continues

-  everybody agrees that fundholding created a 2 tier service
-  that meant that the quality you got depended on where you lived
-  PCGs are like fundholding for everybody except that they are much
bigger
-  there will be about 500 PCGs created in England
-  if you live in areas where there are experienced people in buying
and managing services,  you'll do better than if you lived in areas
where there is no such experience
-  this is made worse by the fact that at present,  you can walk away
from bad service and move to another Surgery nearby
-  in the proposed scheme,  all doctors in your area will have to form
one big service.  To move doctor,  you'll have to move house well
outside your area


>>2.  Divisions and disputes amongst family doctors could have an impact
>>on delivery of care

-  because doctors work independently by contracting their services to
the NHS (and you),  they tended to concentrate on trying to give you, 
their patient the best service they can
-  under the new proposals,  doctors will lose that independence by
being forced into groups of 50 or more doctors whether they like
working with each other or not
-  in many areas,  especially inner cities and border towns and
villages the problems will be compounded
-  in inner cities,  many partnerships have broken down.  As a result, 
there is a large number of single and 2 doctors Surgeries.
-  these,  ex-partners,  will be forced into working together again. 
It's like going back to live with your ex-wife after divorce when each
of you has started a new life elsewhere
-  in border areas,  your doctor may have to deal with more than one
health authority and hospital
-  under the imposed new regime,  your doctor will have to go with the
rest of the group.  This could have an effect on where you receive
treatment or may involve changes to the way you received those services
-  because doctors will have to police each other in the proposed
arrangement and may have to force each other to accept things like
reduced staff levels or cuts in infrastructure support,  this will lead
to endless disputes between doctors that can embroil them in long
battles with each other and distract them from concentrating on the
services they provide to you


>>3.  No time for doctors to do doctoring

-  next time you try to see your doctor,  he or she may not be there
because they will have to attend endless meetings.  They will be just
like civil servants and administrators
-  because running large multi-million pounds organisations (which the
PCGs will be),  doctors will have to spend a lot of time learning and
training for things they were never meant to do
-  because doctors will be under constant pressure to watch the pennies
and pounds (because they are now in charge of all the budget for health
care),  they will be forced to prescribe less,  not prescribe expensive
treatments,  refer less to hospitals for specialist treatment and look
at ways of saving money
-  at the same time,  they will be inheriting large amounts of debts
from health authorities and hospitals as well as having to pay cost of
litigation and compensation against those authorities and hospitals
both past and future cases,  they may be forced to practise what is
called 'defensive medicine' with lots of un-neccessary intervention and
operations to avoid liability
-  all that will lead to doctors' minds being on other things all the
time thus reducing the time available to provide you with quality care
>>4.  Increased rationing

-  family doctors in Britain have always enjoyed protection for their
personal investment in the infrastructure of the NHS.  Things like
surgery buildings and equipment,  reception and nursing staff and the
latest technology to serve you better
-  this infrastructure is supported,  in part,  by a protected budget
-  the new arrangements will remove that protection
-  doctors might find themselves in a situation of conflict of interest
-  for example,  when faced with budget shortfall,  do they provide
more hip operations for the elderly in their area or cut their staff
numbers?
-  we all know that the NHS is not funded adequately,  therefore, 
these budget shortfalls are bound to happen
-  you only need to look at the lengthening waiting lists despite the
little injection of cash to see what I mean
-  all  this will lead to constant pressure on what services to provide
and at what cost
-  this is what is called rationing of services
-  the people who usually suffer from rationing of services are those
considered to be 'expensive' patients like the elderly and chronically
sick

>>5.  Loss of the patient advocate role played by family doctors

-  family doctors in Britain have always been your advocate
-  they speak on your behalf to bring your concerns to the government
and the managers of the NHS
-  they also play an important role in being on your side in cases of
disputes with social services and the DSS
-  your family doctor always has your interest and your interest only
at heart,  he or she has no axes to grind except to defend your rights
to decent health care
-  this important role that family doctors played for generations will
be under threat when they assume all responsibility for buying
services,  spending your money and settling disputes amongst themselves
-  also,  family doctors will always have to watch their backs as the
government and the managers apply pressure on them to cut costs
-  remember,  the independence of your family doctor to prescribe, 
refer and speak up for what is best for you will be gone
-  just like your friendly independent small shop has gone to give way
to impersonal hypermarkets

We continue to expose these threats to patient care with the second
batch of 5 reasons why PCGs are Bad for Patients,  Bad for Doctors and
Bad for Britain tomorrow (in sha' Allah)

The Major


________________________________________

Dr Ahmad Risk
http://mednetics.org
home: +44 1273 724866
work:  +44 1737 240022
fax:     +44 1737 244660




%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
June 2022
October 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager