In article <[log in to unmask]>, Dr Jel Coward
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>In article <[log in to unmask]>, Huw Thomas
snip
>Huw - BTDT - the GP-TUT site idea was mine and the material submitted
>has been excellent (I think there are two topics that have been sent to
>me but got frazzled with the Western Digital crash I had last week - if
>people could check and let me know if there's is not on the site and
>send me another copy I would be grateful (I know this dates back 2
>months of so - been busy, sorry))
>
>The GP-TUT site is free to all - still v early days and desperate for
>more material.
certainly a very good site, but could be made better if material was
formally peer reviewed. Perhaps if you set up a section where users of
the material could make comments about particular material, perhaps at
the bottom of each page?
ie "article omits work by Mr X Lancet 1997 345 1234-56"
http://www.mednetics.org/gptut/ for those that haven't been there yet!
>
>I see the future in free-at-point-of-use systems with innovative
>financing arrangements for the infrastructure- especially if writers are
>working for nothing. GP-TUT has no finance at all - but in time this
>could change - allowing payment to authors.
>
Do you mean sponsorship?
>If anyone wants to get involved with gp-tut then please drop me some E
>(oops - I mean, send me an email ;-)
>
>Cheers :)
I'll send some of my scriblings Currently no registrar at present so no
pressure at present (tutorials anyway)
Huw
--
Huw Thomas
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|