JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


GP-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

GP-UK  1998

GP-UK 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

RE: RE: Locality Communications

From:

John Coulthard <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Thu, 7 May 1998 07:03:44 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (77 lines)

Adrian

I am NOT stating anything on behalf of the NHSE I can't.

Is it not the case that some community trusts may turn themselves into PCGs,
wont they be about that size?   Some staff may be associated i.e. social
service.   That may make them around the size I have referred to, however I
will go with your figure of 50.  Links are needed for scheduling
appointments, document sharing and shared access will need to cross some
fuzzy boundaries.   I am not sure the legal boundaries will be a good basis
for networking boundaries.

How many people do you think might be in the fuzzy boundary of a PCG and do
you think they need to share things like address books, scheduling, digital
signatures etc.

John



-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask]
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Adrian Midgley
Sent: 07 May 1998 00:51
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: RE: Locality Communications


[log in to unmask],Net writes:
>>JC:   I agree, will a PCG be complex organisation?   200 plus employees
>>100,000 patients?

>AR:No.

>Well errrr yes.   About 80 percent of businesses in the UK have less
>than 50
>employees.   200 is complex and very different from 50.   I have run an
>organisation of 398 and that was complex.   You may find it easier to
>herd
>cats than run a PCG:)

>John

John, on behalf of NHSE are you stating here that the guidance on the
White paper - particualry that in HSC 1998 65 has been revoked or was
not entirely accurate in the first place, IE that the place of GPs as
independent contractors under PCG arrangements is in fact going to
change to that of salaried employees of a PCG?

You will wish to seek guidance at a high level before answering in the
affirmative, since the Health Minister and the Secretary of State for
Health are both reported to have assured the highest of the medical
profession's representative bodies that GPs will continue to be small
businesses running their own practices.

But I suspect you will reconsider and answer in the negative, in which
case the largest practice I know has 14 GPs, and approximately 2 whole
time equivalent staff per GP, which given many of them are half time,
and even allowing for the attached hangers on, doies not go above 50
certainly 50 actually plugged in.

Even if St Thomas was a special case, it wold be just that, a special
case.  There is another in GLasgow and another in Whitstable, and no
doubt a couple more, but they are not reasons to give me (single-handed
with 5 employees) a networking solution aimed at being proof against
becomeing an employee of an org of 200.

Perhaps you have debagged the cat after all?

I got that message about a minute after you sent it.  Is NHS Net that
much faster?  And surely if spped is the problem, I will do better with
a cable link locally to give me a T1 speed connection.



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
June 2022
October 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager