In article <[log in to unmask]>, Ahmad Risk
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>On Sun, 3 May 1998 00:35:21 +0100, Jel Coward wrote:
>
>>Agree 100pc - actually does anyone disagree and feel it is
>>reasonable/necessary to send HTML?
>
>Not that long ago, not many mail clients were able to handle MIME. In
>fact, it was 'illegal' to use MIME for Internet mail.
>
>I expect that one day all mail clients will handle HTML. We are not
>there yet.
>
The more sociable clients include HTML in a MIME multipart message, the
other part being a 'normal' text alternative.
Chris
--
Chris Salter (Vice Chairman) Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network
Registered Charity No. 1064177
<URL:http://www.zynet.co.uk/ott/polio/lincolnshire/>
Web Site & Vice Chairman Email: [log in to unmask]
Honorary Secretary Email: [log in to unmask]
Member of the British Healthcare Internet Association
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|