Has anyone any idea why the last three numbers on the new prescription pads
seem to be randomly generated?
Our HA guidance has suggested that we keep records of the serial numbers as
advised by HSC 1998/062 (see COIN). I suppose we just ignore the last three
digits.
Typical DoH really - nice idea, not thought thru', no useful information,
seems doomed to fail.....
-----Original Message-----
From: Ruth Livingstone <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 27 April 1998 20:37
Subject: RE: new prescription forms and printers
>Mary
>My printer regularly eats over 25% of my old scripts :-(
>However, the new scripts do seem more robust, and number eaten has dropped
to
>5%
>Also, although they all have a serial number, this does not seem to be in
>sequence.
>(Can't understand why not, but no doubt there is a logical reason.)
>
>--
>Ruth Livingstone
>http://www.stamford.co.uk/littlesurgery/
>
>----------
>From: [log in to unmask] on behalf of Mary Hawking
>Sent: Sunday, April 26, 1998 06:31
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: new prescription forms and printers
>
>Does anyone know whether the new computer FP10s will be numbered?
>My printer is having a bad time - and chewing up *lots* of prescription
>forms.. anyone else a sufferer? ;-<<
>Mary
>Mary Hawking Kingsbury Court Surgery Church Street Dunstable LU5 4RS
>tel:01582 663218 (surgery)fax:01582 476488 (surgery)
>Member of British Healthcare Internet Association
>Dunstable and Houghton Regis Locality Commisssioning Pilot
>
>
>
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|