In article <000101bd6d7c$3b8e5d80$33557ec2@jeff>, Jeff Green
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>want.
> Could you not set a compromise solution in which staff can authorise 1
>additional repeat only. That should give your patients at least a month to
>make an appointment and be seen for a review (and you a month to reconsider
>your prescribing <GDRVVF>)
Why do we need a bow or a stern wave - if we set things to tell pts to
come in when they have 1 repeat left then why do we need more leeway
which involves giving staff password permissions to re-authorise or
issue acute scripts.
I want to avoid this - by utilising the password permissions - so that
no-one (staff of Drs) can bypass the system and lead me to unwittingly
sign the script.
God - I must be awful to have as a partner ;)
> I have a couple of repeat prescribing protocols, which given the
>relevant
>surgeries permission, I will post here.
>
Please do or email to me if they will let you - would be very gratefully
received.
I like the paper and editorial in BJGP - thanks - is on the desk at
surgery for 'open' reading.
Cheers :)
--
Jelly Bean [log in to unmask]
When you get fed up surfing....
....go find some waves.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|