'Dumb Terminals' in the guise of Windows Terminals or 'Citrix' Clients
can be used to support 32bit client applications i.e. the new breed of
GP applications - its called 'Thin Client' technology and will grow in
importance in the primary care market. Most of the major GP system
suppliers are looking at this technology to support the rollout of their
new clinical applications.
Yours truly,
Mark Treleaven
BDS Solutions
Director, Business Development
Tel: 44 (0)1884 33440
Fax: 44(0)1884 34555
Web: http://www.bds-solutions.co.uk
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask]
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 1998 2:04 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Torex Premiere looks very pretty
[log in to unmask],Net writes:
>For those that want to be more modern it can be
implemented
>on NT, but then of course all the terminals have to be
32 bit from the
>outset - to be able to log into NT!
Odd. I have Windows for Workgroups clients running on
both Windows and
Novell networks, and my understanding is that these
would be accepted
by an NT domain.
I think the only reason why the TOrex client would not
be able to run
on 16 bit Windows machines would be that it was written
in a 32 bit
Windows language, and that it involved system calls not
serviced by the
Win 32s components that one can add to the older
versions of Windows.
It does rather show NT up compared to real networking
OSs like Novell;
Unix; OS/2 though, if it is not possible to run a dumb
terminal against
the version running on NT whereas it is against the Unix
version.
Perhaps it just wasn't written that way.
Any information on the actual database management
system/engine that
Torex have used? It is said to be one widely used in
industry
(portable toilet scheduling and building supply ordering
for instance I
suppose)
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|