<<) but when it impinges on work, that's when I would be concerned.>>
See my other post for reply to this---the essential difference is that I
assume any professional I decide to trust with my work will do the job well
until proven otherwise. You assume that said professional cannot be
trusted unless he produces clean urines x days a week for x weeks.
Actually, I had to part company with the original practice accountant---he
was a man of sober habits but was unable to get his head round my GP
accounts. I didn't pick him, I inherited him and it is extremely unlikely
that I would have picked someone with only two other doctors on his books.
Bringing us back to my point on recruitment of the right person.
Declan
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|