I am writing in Arial 10. I think this was the default when I set up
Outlook, but I may be wrong. I must admit to reading on a 21" <g> screen
and so tend to use small fonts.
This is Arial 12, 14, 16.
This is Times New Roman 10, 12, 14, 16
Any of these any better?
Dr G Mark Trowell
Highbridge Medical Centre
Pepperall Road
Highbridge
Somerset
TA9 3YA
Highbridge - "A cemetery with lights"
(01278) 783220
(01278) 795486 (Fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Andrzej Glowinski
Sent: 05 April 1998 00:07
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: FW: Windows 95 shareware??
Has anyone else experienced the effect of shrinking fonts, apparently
created by MS Mail? Some messages (e.g. from Mark Trowell and many others)
appears to be in something around 4 point (unintentionally, I presume) and
in varying colours - presumably html encoded, but I haven't checked this.
Very hard to read on an lcd screen.
The latest addition is that of change bars. I don't think even Outlook 97
does this, but it may be one of the many "features" I have yet to be
subjected to. I wonder if my messages appear in some huge font size on MS
Mail......Also, there are more attachments with zero information content
appearing - and becoming harder to delete (I know Ahmad will sing the
praises of Pegasus, but I just didn't get on with the interface style!).
I'm starting to find email becoming a lot harder and slower to use because
of these "enhancements" - I've always attached formatted documents if the
style is important. I know that reading formatted messages created in
Outlook is fine - so long as you use Outlook. But is it starting to get
proprietary once more?
Andrzej
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|