On 04/11/98 07:00:14, "Paul Caldwell" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>rejecting something by ballot is v easy, putting a +ve proposal is much
>harder. You'r right though on one thing, if PCGs will adversely affect our
>income I'll be first to the barracades, however they just might (if used
>properly) increase our income. For instance, GPs at the extreme high end of
>referrals and prescribing may well face being eased into retirement by peer
>pressure, hence costs could fall and PCG 'profit' increase to be divided up
>between its 'shareholders'??
Dream on :-)
>I don't believe that any gov can be elected then abuse it's mandate though.
No, of course not. The Natinoalists in Germany and Italy in the 1930s
of course, didn't. Nor did Maggie in 1979, 83, 87. No way! All
governments behave absolutely impeccably with or without huge majorities.
They are always such sweetie pies!
Abuse the mandate? No way! Unheard of! ;-)
Ahmad
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Ahmad Risk
Member of DFI. To join, send email to [log in to unmask]
http://mednetics.org
Home: +44 1273 724866/748198
Work: +44(1737)240022 Fax: +44 1737 244660
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|