In article <[log in to unmask]>, Paul Caldwell
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>rejecting something by ballot is v easy, putting a +ve proposal is much
>harder. You'r right though on one thing, if PCGs will adversely affect our
>income I'll be first to the barracades, however they just might (if used
>properly) increase our income. For instance, GPs at the extreme high end of
>referrals and prescribing may well face being eased into retirement by peer
>pressure, hence costs could fall and PCG 'profit' increase to be divided up
>between its 'shareholders'?? I don't believe that any gov can be elected then
>abuse it's mandate though.
>
You what?
:)
--
Jelly Bean [log in to unmask]
When you get fed up surfing....
....go find some waves.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|