Three cheers to that man.
John Charlton.
Derby. A devout non fundholder.
----------
> From: [log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: For Debate
> Date: 23 March 1998 22:39
>
> > Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 19:17:25 EST
> > Subject: For Debate
> > From: TreforR <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Cc: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask],
[log in to unmask]
> > Reply-to: [log in to unmask]
>
> <big snip>
> > I realise that there are no quick fixes, but why should my clinical
decisions
> > be influenced, not only by the best in evidence based medicine but also
by the
> > irrational, non evidence based, rationing of care by random events and
> > personal prejudices. The patient in front of me deserves the best
evidence
> > based medicine, but if society cannot afford it, I am surely not the
one to
> > decide if they get it or not.
> >
> A true conumdrum.
> Who decides then?
> I remember the outcry in the profession caused by the blacklisting of
> certain drugs. Damn good idea if you ask me. There should be *lots*
> more removed from the BNF.
>
> Of course not everyone will agree with me on this.
> This is another condrum.
> Who decides then?
>
>
> Dr David J Plews
> ------------------------
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|