[log in to unmask],Net wrote at 19:32 on 17/03/98
about "Re: NHSE GP computer survey":
-----------------------------
>>I have on three occasions proposed to NVUG, once at a meeting at
>>which you were present, that the user groups of the users of
>>products owned and/or supported by Reuters should amalgamate as a
>>single user group, in practice meaning a merging of SMUG+ into
>>VAMPUG, and received a deafening silence. Perhaps you would put it
>>on the agenda for your next meeting?
>
>We (NVUG) *have* discussed this, and had concerns that we would not be
able
>to properly represent the concerns and issues relating to SMUG at
meetings
>with Reuters. It was generally felt that it would be best if the User
Groups
>liased and worked together on major issues of commonality, but worked
>separately in relation to specific issues relating to the individual
>products. But I will raise the issue again at our next Executive
meeting in
>April
You are putting forward a good argument explaining why NVUG split
itself into two, one for Vision and one for VM.
Only one fault there, it didn't...
>Vamp Medical has just been accredited to RFA4! (I spoke to the
programmer
>yesterday)
No doubt that will appear on the FHS CU website, momentarily.
And no doubt the SM programmer will be able to break cover and tell
me that SM has been accredited to RFA4, soon. Does your friend the
VM programmer know him? They should be in the same buidling.
-----------------------------
--- OffRoad 1.9r registered to Adrian Midgley
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|