On Fri 27 Feb 98 (21:10:17), [log in to unmask] wrote:
> Folks
> Apologies for earlier rant. Have managed to negotiate the password and
> downloaded the relevant articles and commentary from the Lancet.(Good
> site by the way) Have to say the evidence such as it is does not
> provide a case for changing vaccination policy. Rather spurious
> association in time between infantile vaccine and behaviour dosorder
> onset. Ileal lymphoid hyperplasia being non specific (to any particular
> infection). I would love to know how these parents were selected and
> questioned (lead bias++?) and if the association were positive the
> numbers so far are negligableBUT there is the report of more ill
> children waiting in the wings so watch out for
> those.
> As partner in a practice that offered parents the choice of deferral
> 'til this paper arrived I am proposing we revert to business as usual.
> Dave Young, Derby : )
>
I've had three copies of this, after the first it got rather
repetative
--
_ _ _ _ _
| | | |__| | \ \ / /
__| | | |__| | \ \/\/ /
|__ /OHN |_| |_|ENRY \_/\_/ARRE
[log in to unmask]
http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/jwarre/
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|