On 02/22/98 08:29:42, Ewan Davis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>The answer is simple. That is make the FP10 available as singles on paper of
>at least 60 micron weight, 210 mm wide (A4 width) the same length at the FP10
>plus enough empty space top and bottom to allow for the fact that many
>printer have an unprintable area at the top and bottom of each page. The new
>form should be perforated so that and leading and trailing space and the
>right hand side can be torn off to leave a form of the same dimensions as the
>current FP10 (which is very important for the PPA).
Why? I mean why is it so important to PPA? Or am I asking a stupid
question?
Ewan's solution is neat, but can be neater if we just had scripts
printed on A4 paper. Period.
Neater still, electronic prescribing, but that's another story and far
too simple for the PPa and Richmond House.
Besides, how else can they make the GP's life a misery?
Just in case you thought they were there to help you, think again.
Ahmad
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Ahmad Risk
http://www.cybermedic.org
Chairman British Healthcare Internet Association <http://www.bhia.org>
Director Internet Healthcare Coalition - USA <http://www.ihc.net>
Home: +44 1273 724866/748198
Work: +44(1737)240022 Fax: +44 1737 244660
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|