In article <01bd37e0$ed3f6a00$0100007f@localhost>, Mark O'Connor
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>
>100% or instant parity is still on the same *side* of the argument . Your
>"development cost" argument is a screen for old fashioned greed and
>manipulation.
Ouch!. That is not true. To keep the record straight I love being
single handed and have no intention of expanding my list size, and so
will never have the need to take on a partner. My arguments are based
on principle not my intended practice.
As with all things in the buisness world, the parity deals will be led
by market forces. If there is ever the situation, again, where there are
40 applicants for a job, then Parity deals will move to-wards my
preferences, and while there is a shortage of applicants then I am sure
that short deals to parity will be the norm.
>
>Anyway Rob this will be a sterile argument soon
Possibly but I enjoyed myself. Being single handed has certainly
limited the number of opportunities I have had of being controversial.
Rob
>
Dr R I Johnson
The Family Practice, Church Lane, Sleaford, NG34 7DF
Tel. 01529 305595 Mobile 0378 206475 Fax No 01529 305589
Single handed GP. Send email to [log in to unmask]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|