[log in to unmask],Net wrote at 19:16 on 15/12/98
about "a national voice for PCGs?":
-----------------------------
>Why cannot we have a standing PCGs conference with delegates from all
boards
>mandated on resolutions, cf GPC? There is at present no voice which can
>fulfill that function-the NAPC cannot. Such a standing conferemce
would have
>considerable influence. Maybe that is why the GPC has not suggested it.
-----------------------------
Is it actually for anything that the GPC is not already there for?
PCG Boards should avoid isolating themselves from their LMCs, and
should share at least some of what they are doing with their GPC
representatives to ensure we are either heading in the same
direction, or at least know where conflicts of interests are
appearing.
I think actually loose linkages between the IM&T task groups/IT
departments and the Clinical Gov departments of various PCGs have
more to offer us, but I see them as more swaps for solutions and
work than as bodies to pass resolutions.
Duplicating GPC would weaken us, dragging its members into
communication with PCGs will strengthen us.
--- OffRoad 1.9r registered to Adrian Midgley
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|