Information here is that the University 'owns' academics thoughts! And
so anything that is produced by an academic in the course of their work
is University property (scary eh?) and therefore should be shared with
students - and surely this is good practice... what about Teaching and
Learning audits ? QAA assessments etc.
Chris Baxter
Service/Project Co-ordinator
Disability Support
The Nottingham Trent University
Burton Street
Nottingham
NG1 4BU
0115 9486395 Voice
0115 9486357 minicom
0115 9486358 fax
email [log in to unmask]
http://www.ntu.ac.uk/sss/
>----------
>From: [log in to unmask][SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: 11 December 1998 10:35
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Equal Opportunities
>
>
>I've been very interested in the various responses that
>there have been on the mailbase regarding equal
>opportunities and good practise, particularly as I have big
>problems getting some lecturers to provide lecture notes
>and copies of OHPs to students with dyslexia and other
>disabilities. I have one department that refuses to provide
>copies of lecture notes on the basis that they are
>"intellectual property". Has anyone else come up against
>this argument? And if so, can you recommend any
>counter-arguments!?
>Thanks
>Kate
>----------------------
>
>Kate Eldridge
>Administrative Officer
>University Office
>University of Aberdeen
>Tel: 01224 273286
>E-mail: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|