At 10:36 AM -0400 9/24/98, Brian Griner wrote:
>I like the idea of XWinBUGS (although I would be very happy with an
>upgrade of Classic BUGS for the hp). The option below sounds very slow.
>My colleague is running NT on a DEC Alpha and he said that Windows
>applications run very slowly. Since I am on a network, Xwindow runs
>very slowly so Classic BUGS upgrade with RCODA would be faster for me.
[Talking about running on my Mac using an emulator]
Of course, it's slower than it would be if it were possible to run a native
Macintosh version. But a 180 MHz Pentium is, though not the state of the
art, respectable in speed.
I can compare directly with Classic Bugs on a Sparcstation 20. The
Macintosh emulation on my Mac is slightly faster on the same problem.
Can't speak to emulations of Windows on other machines, though. It
certainly could be very slow, depending on the machine.
Bill
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|