On Sat, 21 Mar 1998, Dougolly wrote:
> I'd only like to appeal to this chat page not to take for verities positions
> that are weakly informed or argued -- especially the position that any
> interpretation is equal to any other.
- not "any" and not "equal", certainly. But when you perform (read, or
attend to in some fashion) a text/score in whatever way, there's usually
more than one way to do so with at least validity, thank heavens, or the
whole process would become too boring for words, as it were. In saying
this I'm aware that I'm "arguing" weakly, but as a statement it is at
least supported by some years of practical "information" - gosh! I hope
that's ok!
RC
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|